First of all, the TextBox Control is not a secure way to hold passwords - so don’t use it as it is by default. Even with a PasswordChar, the real password is still visible if you use a tool like Spy++.
The Flaw (Explained)
As an example, take a simple TextBox with PasswordChar = ‘*‘.
Now, if you use Spy++ and inspect this application, you can get the password.
But…why is this happening?
Spy++ sends the message WM_GETTEXT (0x000D) to the TextBox, and the control just returns its value. It’s actually working as intended and it reacts just like any other control, that obeys any message received.
Fixing this issue…
I found a way to solve this by not allowing the TextBox to process the ‘malicious’ messages. So the solution consists in blocking any WM_GETTEXT message unless it was sent by the Text property.
If the Text property is called, it will send an WM_GETTEXT message, so it will surely be an internal (safe) call. But if that message is received and the Text property wasn’t called, then it might be risky to return the password, so we’ll not process that message.
I wrote a “safer” TextBox here, just to show you the idea, feel free to write your own or simply improve this one.
class ProtectedTextBox : TextBox
{
// the malicious message, that needs to be handled
private const int WM_GETTEXT = 0x000D;
// 'true' if the messages are sent from our program (from Text property)
// 'false' if they're sent by anything else
bool allowAccess { get; set; }
public override string Text // overriding Text property
{
get
{
allowAccess = true; // allow WM_GETTEXT (because it's an internal call)
return base.Text; //this sends the message above in order to retrieve the TextBox's value
}
set
{
base.Text = value;
}
}
protected override void WndProc(ref Message m)
{
if (m.Msg == WM_GETTEXT) // if the message is WM_GETTEXT
{
if (allowAccess) // and it comes from the Text property
{
allowAccess = false; //we temporary remove the access
base.WndProc(ref m); //and finally, process the message
}
}
else
base.WndProc(ref m);
}
}
No comments:
Post a Comment