⭐ If you would like to buy me a coffee, well thank you very much that is mega kind! : https://www.buymeacoffee.com/honeyvig Hire a web Developer and Designer to upgrade and boost your online presence with cutting edge Technologies

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

“AI Will Not Just Change Jobs in India — It Will Expose the Weakness of Degree-Based Employment and Force a Skill-Based Revolution”

 

Artificial Intelligence is not just another technology shift. It is a structural transformation that will redefine how India works, hires, and grows. From my experience in staffing and workforce deployment across industries, I can clearly say that AI will initially reduce jobs in India more sharply than in many developed countries, and the reason lies in India’s education system, job preferences, and workforce mindset.


1. India’s Biggest Structural Weakness: Degree-Based Education, Not Skill-Based Education

In India, the majority of students pursue degrees like B.Tech, B.Sc, B.Com, MBA—not necessarily to gain skills, but to secure employment eligibility.

However, AI does not value degrees. AI replaces tasks based on skill level and task repetition.

Today, many engineering graduates:

  • Lack practical industry skills
  • Depend on routine technical work
  • Perform repetitive coding, testing, and support tasks

These are exactly the tasks AI can automate.

This means:

AI will directly impact degree-holders who do not have specialized skills.

India produces over 1.5 million engineers every year. If even 30–40% of entry-level roles are automated, the impact will be massive.


2. Government Job Preference Is Slowing India’s AI Adaptation

Another major challenge unique to India is the mindset of job security.

A large portion of India’s educated youth prefers:

Instead of developing future-ready skills, millions of students spend 3–5 years preparing for government exams.

During this time, they do not gain industry skills.

Meanwhile, AI is advancing rapidly.

This creates a dangerous gap:

While technology moves forward, workforce skills remain stagnant.

This will make adaptation slower and job displacement higher in the initial phase.


3. Entry-Level Technical Jobs Will Be Hit First in India

India’s IT and technical employment model has always depended on large-scale hiring of freshers for routine work such as:

  • Basic coding
  • Software testing
  • Technical support
  • Data processing
  • Backend operations

AI can now perform these tasks faster, cheaper, and more accurately.

Earlier: A company needed 100 fresh engineers.

Now: The same company may need only 40–50 engineers supported by AI.

This means fewer entry-level opportunities initially.

This impact is already visible in hiring trends, where many companies are slowing fresher hiring.


4. India’s Advantage Is Also Its Risk: Large Workforce

India has the world’s largest youth population.

This is a strength—but also a risk.

If workforce skills do not evolve fast enough, AI can create short-term job displacement, especially in:

  • IT services
  • BPO sector
  • Technical support roles
  • Routine engineering jobs

This may create temporary unemployment pressure.


5. Why AI Adaptation Is Tough in India Compared to Developed Countries

Countries like USA, Germany, and Singapore have:

In India, education is still focused heavily on:

  • Exams
  • Degrees
  • Theoretical knowledge

This slows AI readiness.


6. Initial Phase Reality: AI Will Kill Some Jobs in India

It is important to be honest.

In the initial phase, AI will reduce certain types of jobs, especially:

  • Entry-level IT jobs
  • Routine engineering jobs
  • BPO jobs
  • Data processing jobs

This is not permanent destruction—but a transition phase.

Similar transitions happened during:


7. Long-Term Reality: AI Will Create More Powerful Opportunities for India

Despite initial job reduction, India has a massive long-term advantage.

India has:

  • Largest technical talent pool
  • Strong IT infrastructure
  • Global outsourcing leadership

India will shift from low-skill services to high-skill AI-enabled services.

This will create new roles such as:

  • AI Engineers
  • Automation Specialists
  • AI-assisted developers
  • Data Engineers
  • Cybersecurity professionals

India will move from manpower-based economy to skill-based economy.


8. Impact on Staffing and Recruitment Industry (Based on My Experience )

The hiring model will change significantly.

Earlier model: Mass hiring of freshers

Future model: Selective hiring of highly skilled professionals

Companies will now prefer:

  • Skilled candidates over degree holders
  • Productivity over headcount
  • Skill-based hiring over qualification-based hiring

This will increase the importance of professional staffing companies who can identify skilled talent.


9. Final Truth: India Is Entering a Skill-Based Era

AI is not the enemy of India.

But it is a challenge for India’s current education and employment mindset.

In the short term, AI may reduce certain jobs.

But in the long term, it will:

  • Increase productivity
  • Increase GDP
  • Increase demand for skilled professionals
  • Strengthen India’s position globally

The real risk is not AI.

The real risk is not upgrading skills.


Final Message from My Perspective 

India is standing at a critical turning point.

Those who depend only on degrees may struggle.

Those who develop real skills will lead the future.

AI will not eliminate India’s workforce.

It will separate skilled professionals from degree holders.

This transition is tough—but necessary—for India to become a global technology leader.

Improving Supply Chain Product and SAP WMS System Delivery Through Storage Bin-Level Insights

 

In every SAP EWM implementation I have worked on, there has been one transaction that quietly became the bridge between system design, business expectations, and real warehouse execution: /SCWM/LS03 – Display Storage Bin

It may look like a simple display screen, but in multiple project phases — from design workshops to hypercare- this is where some of the most important conversations happened.

Where It Started: Blueprint & Design Discussions

During the blueprint phase, storage bins are usually discussed in terms of:

  • Storage types
  • Putaway strategies
  • Picking logic
  • Activity areas

Everything sounds perfect on slides. But when we moved into system realisation and started validating the physical warehouse layout in EWM, /SCWM/LS03 became the place where we asked:

Does the bin configuration actually support the business process? Can this bin physically handle the HU and product weight? Is this bin eligible for the correct activity area and queue?

A Real Project Moment: Putaway Was Failing. In one of my implementations, inbound warehouse tasks were not getting created for certain HUs. Configuration looked correct. The search sequence looked correct. Storage type was correctly determined.

The issue? The system was rejecting the bin during the capacity check. When we analysed the bin in /SCWM/LS03, We found:

  • The maximum weight maintained was lower than the actual HU weight
  • The current utilisation had already crossed the allowed threshold

From a business perspective, the warehouse team was saying: “Space is available — why is the system not allowing putaway?” From a system perspective: “The bin is full.”

That moment helped align teams around why accurate master data is critical for system-driven execution.

Functional Learning: It was not just the Master Data

Further, I started using this transaction not just for issue resolution, but for:

✔ Validating putaway strategy behaviour

Is the correct storage section being picked? Is the bin type aligned with the product master and packaging specification?

✔ Debugging picking issues

If a picker cannot pick from a bin, checking the items below quickly explains the system’s decision:

  • Stock removal block
  • Activity area assignment
  • Fixed bin relevance for replenishment

✔ Supporting UAT & business simulations

During testing cycles, this helped us answer the most common user question:

“Why did the system choose this bin?” And once users understood that logic, system trust increased significantly.

The Business Impact: Building Trust in EWM

One of the biggest success factors in an EWM implementation is users' confidence in system-driven processes, not just the configuration. This transaction helped in:

  • Explaining system behaviour in business language
  • Reducing manual overrides
  • Enabling faster issue resolution in hypercare
  • Training super users with real, practical scenarios

It turned technical settings into visual, understandable warehouse logic.

How I Use It Today

Across my recent work in SAP WMS and EWM-driven environments, I use /SCWM/LS03 as:

  • A design validation tool
  • A testing accelerator
  • A production support diagnostic screen
  • A business discussion enabler

Because when something goes wrong in warehouse execution, sometimes the answer is often in complex debugging, but mainly it is in understanding the storage bin.

If you are an enthusiast of the EWM process and config, please DM. Let's discuss and exchange ideas.